Judge to rule on evidence in Caza child porn case The child porn trial of convicted pedophile David Caza has been adjourned as the judge decides whether a police investigator overstepped Caza's Charter louis vuitton bags price list 2014 rights.
Supreme Court Justice Robert Powers said he will rule April 11 whether the trial can proceed with evidence obtained through online surveillance without a warrant. Court of Appeal and possibly the Supreme Court of Canada. Caza is charged with possession and distribution of child pornography and sexually luring cheap louis vuitton bags $30 a child. He has been in custody since his arrest Jan. 13, 2010. pedophile, gained access to Caza's computer through a peer to peer file sharing network called GigaTribe. They did so without seeking a search warrant. In a voir dire a trial within a trial Crown prosecutor Bernie Caffaro argued Tuesday that such Charter of Rights issues need to be kept in perspective. Caffaro questioned whether there would be a threat to public interest if the evidence were to be rolled into the trial. He noted earlier testimony from Det. Paul Krawczyk that he could see no purpose for GigaTribe other than trading in child porn. "We've got the evidence on Mr. Caza's hard drive," Caffaro said. "We know what he was doing with GigaTribe." Krawczyk was operating in a legal environment that was not obvious but did not flagrantly violate Charter rights, he said. "Recognize that we are dealing with a new world of technology. We're dealing with new relationships online I submit, every coin has a flip side, new ways for criminals to conceal evidence, but it's created entirely new modes of creating crime." It louis vuitton shoes date code is for the court to set the boundaries for investigators, he concluded. "Det. Krawczyk, perhaps, found himself at the very crossroads of these challenges." Powers said the court must consider whether there was a reasonable expectation louis vuitton neverfull mm price 2014 of privacy online by the person who was sharing the files. "The technology as it exists right now creates an expectation of privacy and as much as that's an attraction to criminals, it is attractive to other people," Gustafson argued.
"The court does need to be cautious. I'm not wanting the court to speculate about where this will go." There is no case precedence in Canada to give direction on the admissibility of such evidence.
Prev: louis vuitton bags 2013 prices
Next: louis vuitton neverfull roses